Diplomacy, No to War on the Korean Peninsula
1. IPB condemns U.S., North Korean and other nations’ development possession and threats to initiate nuclear war, as well as any threats to initiate so-called “conventional” war. We demand a diplomatic and non-coercive resolution of the U.S.-Korean crisis.
2. The current U.S.-DPRK crisis and the unacceptable humanitarian consequences of wars and nuclear war lead us to urgently call for an end to military threats and for diplomatic resolution of the crisis. There are no military solutions to this nuclear confrontation.
IPB has long opposed the development, possession, threat and use of nuclear weapons by any state. It has demanded and pressed for the complete elimination of nuclear weapons as called for in the United Nations General Assembly’s first resolution, in numerous subsequent General Assembly resolutions, Article VI of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, the International Court of Justice’s 1996 Advisory Opinion on the Use and Threatened Use of Nuclear weapons, and in the Nuclear Weapons Prohibition Treaty. It has similarly opposed militarism, wars of intervention, and coercion designed to establish or to reinforce hegemonic rule by foreign nations.
These commitments lead the IPB to strongly condemn North Korea’s nuclear and missile testing, US nuclear intimidation, provocative military exercises and threats to initiate nuclear or other preemptive military attacks against North Korea.
The cycle of reciprocal provocations and rhetorical threats by the U.S. and North Korean governments risk moving beyond control. Such threats can create political dynamics that lead governmental officials to escalate tensions or to initiate military actions. In the context of heightened nuclear alerts, the danger of nuclear accidents or miscalculation greatly increases the dangers of war and nuclear war. In the Northeast Asian context, a U.S.-North Korean military conflict could have disastrous consequences in South Korea, Japan and other Asian and Pacific nations. It could also draw in other nuclear-armed states, Russia, China, and NATO.
With growing fears arising from the crisis, there are increasing and dangerous calls by sectors of elites and popular opinion in Japan and South Korea for their countries to become nuclear powers. North East Asia is now the region in greatest danger of nuclear proliferation. Such developments would increase the possibility of nuclear war and seriously undermine the nonproliferation regime.
3. Diplomacy and mutual restraint are now imperative. Additional nuclear weapons tests by North Korea threaten the release of poisonous radioactive materials that would impact its people, and those of neighboring nations and beyond. Further threats and greater isolation of North Korea through ratcheting up sanctions will obstruct rather than encourage diplomatic engagement and solutions.
The 6 Party talks on Korean denuclearisation are the only existing multilateral framework for negotiations. IPB supports any bilateral or multilateral initiatives to resume these or other talks to advance their key aims.
Securing regional stability also depends on negotiation of a peace treaty to end the Korean war and, ultimately, negotiation of a Nuclear Weapons Free Zone in North East Asia.
IPB appreciates that some level of communication between the U.S. and North Korean governments is being maintained via North Korea’s delegation to the United Nations. It welcomes the U.N. Secretary-General’s offer to assist in negotiations and his call for the resumption of the Six Party Talks, as well as those of the European Union, and the Chinese and Russian governments.
Russia and China, and much of civil society have called for a “freeze for freeze” with the US and Allies suspending military rehearsals for war and North Korea halting its missile and nuclear weapons tests. This appears to be the most promising path to reducing tensions and creating the environment in which negotiations can proceed to finally end the Korean War, and lead to the full implementation of previous agreements for the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula. These in turn can contribute to the further negotiation of a new regional security mechanism to address the security concerns of all and to a Northeast Asia Nuclear Weapons Free Zone.
4. IPB therefore urgently demands that:
* the U.S. and North Korean governments unconditionally agree to engage in negotiations to defuse the crisis
* governments around the world, and the United Nations explicitly reject a military solution to the Korean conflict, oppose the ongoing accumulation of military assets and forces on and around the peninsula; oppose sanctions with damaging humanitarian consequences, and call for mutual restraint as a necessary first step back towards diplomacy and the resumption of the Six Party Talks.
5. We call on IPB member organizations to take up the issue as a matter of urgency, and encourage their members to endorse this statement with its call for mutual restraint through a ‘freeze for freeze’ and a return to diplomacy to achieve denuclearisation and a peace settlement.
|56||Mr Matthias Reichl||Austria||Nov 09, 2020|
|55||Ms Mary Girard||Canada||Jun 04, 2020|
|54||Ms AZUBUIKE NWENEWO||Nigeria||May 26, 2020|
|53||Mr Detlef Beune||Germany||Apr 05, 2020|
|52||Mr Okechukwu De-Lawrence Umezuruike||Nigeria||Jan 08, 2020|
|51||Ms Hannah Kemp-Welch||United Kingdom||Jul 23, 2019|
|50||Dr. Lars Fischer||Germany||Jun 06, 2019|
|49||Mr Bright Okeke||Nigeria||May 19, 2019|
|48||Mrs Katrin Ames||Germany||Mar 05, 2018|
|47||Dr. Akbar Montaser||USA||Mar 01, 2018|
|46||Mr Fred Norman||United States||Feb 28, 2018|
|45||Mr Michael Böhner||Deutschland||Feb 26, 2018|
|44||Ms prescilla tulipat||Philippines||Feb 15, 2018|
|43||Ms Mihyeon LEE||South Korea||Feb 14, 2018|
|42||Ms Guyot Madeleine||France||Feb 08, 2018|
|41||Dr. Christopher Butler||England||Feb 07, 2018|
|40||Dr. Stratis Efthymiou||Germany||Feb 06, 2018|
|39||Mrs Lohes Rajeswaran||Switzerland||Feb 05, 2018|
|38||Dr. Zenaida Reyes||Philippines||Feb 05, 2018|
|37||Ms kristine karch||Germany||Feb 04, 2018|
|36||Mr Kajimoto Shushi||Japan||Feb 04, 2018|
|35||Ms Consuelo Rivera-Fuentes||United Kingdom||Feb 04, 2018|
|34||Dr. Susan Hawthorne||Australia||Feb 04, 2018|
|33||Ms ingeborg breines||norway||Feb 02, 2018|
|32||Ms Eva-Maria David-Ballero||Netherlands||Feb 02, 2018|
|31||Ms Merci Angeles||Philippines||Feb 02, 2018|
|30||Mr Iain Atack||Ireland||Feb 01, 2018|
|29||Ms David Webb||United Kingdom||Feb 01, 2018|
|28||Ms Katy Beaver||Seychelles||Feb 01, 2018|
|27||Ms Angelo Cardona||Colombia||Feb 01, 2018|
|26||Ms Hanaa Edwar||Iraq||Feb 01, 2018|
|25||Ms Corazon Fabros||Philippines||Feb 01, 2018|
|24||Mr Nick Deane||Australia||Feb 01, 2018|
|23||Ms Kathryn Kelly||Australia||Jan 31, 2018|
|22||Ms Margaret Loyon||France||Jan 31, 2018|
|21||Ms Colin Archer||United Kingdom||Jan 31, 2018|
|20||Ms lilian halls-french||France||Jan 31, 2018|
|19||Mr Michael Badar||United States||Jan 31, 2018|
|18||Mr Peter Hovgaard||Norway||Jan 31, 2018|
|17||Mr Joseph Gerson||USA||Jan 31, 2018|
|16||Ms Zoé Dubois||Belgium||Jan 31, 2018|
|15||Ms Ursula Schubert||Germany||Jan 31, 2018|
|14||Mr Reiner Braun||Germany||Jan 31, 2018|
|13||Mr Lucas Wirl||Germany||Jan 31, 2018|
|12||Mr Eero Kivistö||Finland||Jan 31, 2018|
|11||Ms Bechon Cyrille Rolande||Cameroon||Jan 31, 2018|
|10||Mr Ferdinand Liefert||Germany||Jan 30, 2018|
|9||Ms Anuradha Chenoy||India||Jan 30, 2018|
|8||Mrs Phyllis Creighton||Canada||Jan 30, 2018|
|7||Ms Kevin Martin||USA||Jan 30, 2018|